- 泽任订制
- FST动物实验器械
- 瑞士ideal-tek镊子
- 瑞士Dumont镊子
- Weller
- Techni-Tool
- 瑞士Rubis镊子
- arosurgica
- Genesee Scientific
- Gilder Grids
-
Entegris
- WEICON
- ACCURIS
- AIMS
- RMC钻石刀
- Sipel镊子
- 德国WIHA
-
Si-Mat
- Jokari
- Circuitmedic
-
Glissando病理切片扫描仪
- KNIPEX(凯尼派克)
- Swann-morton
- Cellpoint Scientific
- Swanstrom
- All-spec
- 新华器械
- Excelta
- MENDA
- MEISEI
- Erem
- Regine
-
OPTRASCAN病理扫描仪
- Benchmark
-
IDEAL
- 大龙仪器
- 五洋医疗
- Hozan(宝山)
- 3M
- Stoelting
- Roboz
-
Diatome钻石刀
- Fine Science Tools
- PLATO
- NanoSoft
-
Avantama
-
PSI打击器及配件
- Aptum
- xuron
- SPI
-
抗原检测
- ASI Instruments
-
上海一恒
-
上海雷磁
- Quantifoil
- 上海方需
- 苏州六六
-
Hamilton
- ISMART
-
显微镜
-
Bonllmann
- AVEN
- 塔望科技
-
瑞典Haglof激光测距仪
- STILLE
-
美国安维迪
- 德国贝朗蛇牌
- Medline
-
蛋白纯化系统
-
OHAUS奥豪斯
- 康博特森
- Ossila
- 赛宁(苏州)生物
- Bernstein
- 洁盟清洗机
- Ted Pella
- DSI
- Keller
-
Smart Tweezers
- 瑞士PB
-
Microscopes Internat...
- Lattice Gear
-
凯氏定氮仪
- lindstrom
- 美国EMS
-
1-material
-
仪器
- realisticflies
- Boive
- Zivic
One for All: the Universal Buffer
We are delighted to present our innovative and patent-pending R-Universal buffer for antigen unmasking/epitope recovery on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections. The "R" in R-Universal represents Retriever, emphasizing its compatibility with the 2100 Retriever device. Extensive testing of this buffer has been conducted in pathology labs throughout the UK, ensuring its efficacy and reliability. We are excited to make it available not only to Retriever users but also to researchers working with routine tissue material
The underlying processes of heat-induced epitope recovery are not entirely clear, despite various claims made in the field [1]. Heat, whether applied through a microwave, pressure cooker, or water bath, leads to protein denaturation, which is believed to expose linear peptide epitopes on the protein, thus improving their accessibility [2]. However, the pH of the recovery buffer plays a critical role in achieving the desired staining outcome with a specific antibody. If the pH of the buffer is not suitable for a particular antibody, it can result in unexpected staining patterns or even no staining at all, often leading to non-specific staining [3]. Consequently, a range of buffers is recommended, with each designed for a specific epitope, such as Citrate, EDTA, Tris at different pH levels (e.g., pH 3.5, pH 6, pH 8, pH 9.5, pH 10, etc.) [4]. It is also worth noting that while Tris-based buffers may work well in the microwave, their performance in pressure-cooker types of processing units is typically suboptimal.
During fixation and drying, calcium ions are known to precipitate in the tissue and can impact staining outcomes. Furthermore, formalin, commonly used for fixation, induces cross-linking between proteins and other molecules within the tissue. Formaldehyde primarily reacts with ε-amino groups of lysine residues (reversibly), while secondary reactions form irreversible cross-links between amino residues, amino acids, and DNA [6,7]. The proposed use of citraconic anhydride for epitope recovery is based on its reversible reaction with modified ε-amino groups, resulting in improved antigen unmasking [8]. However, it should be noted that citraconic anhydride is toxic and requires lengthy epitope recovery at high temperatures (+950°C). Additionally, in our studies (unpublished), we have observed weak reactivity of certain antibodies, such as those targeting transcription factors like TTF-1, with sections recovered using citraconic anhydride.
Lastly, certain epitopes, such as those found on epithelial markers Ep-CAM, GFAP, and others, require proteolytic processing for successful epitope recoveryAdditionally, the quality of epitope recovery is significantly influenced by the quality of fixation and processing. Factors such as the duration of fixation, thorough washing to remove fixative residues, and the temperature of the paraffin used can all impact the effectiveness of retrieval. In situations where large series of stainings are performed on collections from archives, which have been formed over time, there is a risk of variations in the efficiency of epitope retrieval. We have had clients who, prior to adopting the Retriever, experienced false negatives in up to 30% of cases, even for well-established markers such as the estrogen receptor. This highlights the potential magnitude of the problem when working with less routine antibodies.